Can anyone tell me when the State Enrolled Assistant Nurses Association was formed?
Thank you.
Mick
Hi Mick,
The simple answer is that the SEAN was created by the Nurses Act which received royal assent on 22/04/1943.Scotland was some months later I believe.
Peter
This may help; http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/SearchUI/details/AssetMain?iaid=C6417
Hi Backman, thanks for that, I have that info, the history of the Enrolled Nurse is very interesting, I am in the process of trawling through HANSARD.
I'm currently undertaking another little project and need the date that the SEANA was formed. There is something else that you may be able to confirm, that they were actually related to the National Association of State Enrolled Nurses and that NASEN was formed around 1961 when 'assistant' was removed from the SEN's title?
Sorry Mike,I learnt nothing from my tutors"Read the question-Answer the question".
The Association for State Enrolled Assistant Nurses were certainly around shortly after the establishment of the Roll.The earliest mention I can find in the British Journal of Nursing is of an annual meeting at the West Middlesex County Hospital reported in September 1947.Unfortunately the BJN was firmly anti the Roll,so I may have more luck in some of my Nursing Mirror magazines of the time.
I'll see what I can find out.
hi have you tried to get hold of a book called " a history of the General Nursing Council for England and Wales 1919-1969" by Eve R.D Bendall and Elizabeth Raybould ? A worth whileread on the history of the GNC and all aspects of nurse registration/enrollment May have the answers to some of your questions
sue
Thank you Peter that would be really useful, I can guess the content of the letters pages.
Hi Sue, I have that book and an interesting (and enlightening) read it is, personally I think it should be required reading on the curriculum.
I didn't really make myself clear in the first post, I have extensive information on the history of Enrolled Nurses, it was that research that prompted me to originally join this forum. All that I need is the date the SEANA was formed (well obviously not all that I need, it never ends!). I would guess, as Peter says, it was around shortly after the roll was established.
Mick
After wading through the BJN, I have found my answer - It may be of interest to other forum members.
http://rcnarchive.rcn.org.uk/data/VOLUME091-1943/page119-volume91-october1943.pdf
Mick
That is interesting,particularly that it originated in Essex as the medal I have is from Essex County Council for training of assistant nurses dated 1942. It featured in the newsletter 28?
There is another piece here.
http://rcnarchive.rcn.org.uk/data/VOLUME092-1944/page058-volume92-may1944.pdf
Mick
the arguments sound very similar to some of those recently about opening up RCN membership to Health Care Assistants.Perhaps history repeating?
The arguments against were getting more and more tenuous each month. The one about the cost of setting up and running of the roll coming primarily from the fees paid by the Registered nurses would, I think, have been understandable, bearing in mind what many of us think about our fees and where the money goes today.
You are right about the anti - HCA or HCSW brigade they are certainly out there.
As for the BNJ, these few lines in the June 1943 edition perhaps indicates where many people think it all went wrong ;D
A Student Name writes:
"We students are looking
forward to the- admission of Assistant Nurses in this
hospital, hoping they will relieve us of some of the drudgery
in the wards."
Apologies if this out of sequence - Peter - yes it was News Page 28 where the badge was displayed (lt bottom Column):-
http://www.schoolsofnursing.co.uk/Newspages/Newspage028.htm
But we were not sure of the status of the recipient I recall:-
"And also those who cared about rewarding their efforts. The Medal below was awarded to one Gladys Prior of St Margaret's Hospital, Epping on July 31st 1942. It is marked 'Training of Assistant Nurses'. I am personally uncertain whether it was to an assistant nurse, or a nurse who taught them. Solid silver. Hallmarked. A serious piece of nursing history from those with the foresight to recognize the value of not only Assistant Nurses but also the permanent recording of that history"...
Will.
I seem to remember that the original SEANs were able to gain the qualification without any training other than hospital experience and being recommended by their Matron.
Hi.
Yes, I can't offhand remember all the details but SEN's were still qualifying by virtue of experience in the early 70's. I was a pupil nurse teacher at the time and remember the difficult questions put to me by several experienced nursing assistants about why they should continue their courses when they could simply apply via their service side SNO for direct approval by the GNC. At the same time there was no guarantee that the SNO recommendation would be accepted by the GNC, but refusal did seem unlikely if the SNO gave support.
Luckily none of my 'groups' sought to leave the course. Must have been my charisma! Or the fact that I was male and just a few years younger at the time......
Will.
There were between 300 and 800 enrolled nurses a month accepted to the roll after the roll was opened in March 1944, (some sources say July 1944) and before examination, it is quite difficult to find numbers but there were around 17,000 State Enrolled Assistant Nurses in England and Wales at 31st March, 1952 (there is no significance to that date).
The first Training Schools for Assistant Nurses, were approved and accepted in February 1945, of interest here is that they were in Essex which would suggest they were quite progressive. These were St. Margaret's Hospital, Epping ; St. John's Hospital, Chelmsford ; St. Andrew's Hospital, Billericay; and Orsett Lodge Hospital, Grays.
It was accepted that there were many Red Cross, auxiliary, and Assistant Nurses very experienced in the practical nursing of the sick and wounded during the war years and it was left to the GNC to decide from the evidence produced who should go on to the roll.
I haven't been able to find the end of qualifying by experience rules so Will's post is very interesting, in the early 80's I worked with an ex-RAF medical assistant who told me he was accepted onto the roll, which would have been in the 70's. As an aside to this there were different qualifying periods and relaxation of the rules during the 1990's for conversion from EN to RN, this caused some muttering at the time, nothing new under the sun.
Mick
As someone who taught on the conversion course I know that many were unhappy at having to do it. I always felt that the dynamics of the ward and dept teams were upset by the loss of good ENs.I know that many good ENs left nursing altogether as they did not want to change.As an employer in the private sector I had to use a lot of my training budget for conversion courses and listen to the upsets of some staff who were perfectly happy in what they were doing. In my humble opinion I feel that nursing shot itself in the foot by doing this, many less academic people did and still do want to be nurses and the EN qualification allowed that. Now to be offered the role of a HCSW/ HCA does not have the same cachet to it. I remember standing up at a meeting for Educationalists at the RCN and saying this and being booed, not a very nice experience. I later taught and verified HCA courses but believe me travelling around assessing there was no common standard like the GNC. Apologies for the ramblings of an old person!
That wasn't really a ramble, but a fair reflection. It is interesting that in the UK some hospitals call their HCA's/HCSW's 'Nursing Assistants' same job same pay band different title. I can imagine it won't be long before someone suggests 'Assistant Nurse' and we are back full circle. As an aside if the Nursing Assistant and /or establishment allows NA's to be called nurses without correction I believe it is still illegal to pass yourself off as a nurse if your aren't on the register.
Like magpie I worked with many excellent SEN's - in fact I would admit to having gained a considerable amount of my own practical experience from some of them. They had much to offer and offered much. Being boo'ed by educationists? Makes me wonder where they were educated?! And yes, that 'Nurse' title still stands I think - and so it should - it was a mechanism for protecting the public as well as acknowledging status. I think that it should have been more vigorously applied - perhaps it still should be. It would save splitting a lot of hairs....
Will.